It uses scripts and run all the time when I open a new profile! () Iry Psy: ALLWAYS INSTALL when start NEW PROFILE! But I don't give any permission.() Jezreel Gacema Benjamin: Até hoje nunca tive problemas com essa ferramenta.() Bruno de Oliveira: Falha no MacOS 12.3.1Ĭhrome Version 1.115 (Official Build) (arm64).funciona muito bem me protegeu de muitos sites que abrem sozinho e tem virus e ainda tem a classificação do site q avisa antes de entrar se e seguro ou não. () Jessica Silva de Lima: gostei muito dessa extensão.() JEISSON ALEXANDER MALAMBO MORENO: Es excelente.I just wish I could use it in Microsoft Windows 10. () Gord Vogel: Great extension I've had no problems as of yet.() Juan Carlos Restrepo Peinado: La extensión es buena, bloquea la mayoría de anuncios.() Alberto Ascani: Funziona alla perfezione da anni.Poor software management from their side. And then they DO NOT remove them when their antivirus is removed from the user system. () Saud Aljaffer: Avira makes them "pre-installing" extensions where they always re-install themselves when a new Chrome user profile is created.Six products managed to achieve a perfect score of 18: Avast, Avira, Bitdefender, G DATA, Kaspersky, and Trend Micro. AV-TEST found that PC Matic identified well over two dozen false positives and blocked applications. The worst category score of all, a 3.0, was given to PC Matic for usability, giving it the lowest overall score (15). Microsoft Defender, ESET, Microworld and PC all got 17 points, but AV-TEST emphasized that while these still offer very reliable levels of security, they just made a few small mistakes. How heavily Defender loads the systems and how poorly it performs in comparison to the other antivirus programs was not explained in detail.Įlsewhere, 14 of the 18 packs received top product reviews, with a score of 17.5 or higher. Since the system load is significantly higher than with the other products, Defender loses a whole point and thus ends up with 5 out of 6 points,” writes AV-PRÜFEN. “Windows Defender Antivirus for consumers generates the highest system load in the test. The good news for those who use it is that Microsoft Defender got the perfect score of 6 in the protection and usability categories, but the 5/6 it was rated for performance was the worst of any program tested. net and Trend Micro.ĪV-TEST awarded a total of 6 points for each of the three test categories: protection, performance and usability. The 18 security packages put through their paces were: AhnLab, Avast, AVG, Avira, Bitdefender, ESET, F-Secure, G DATA, K7 Computing, Kaspersky, Malwarebytes, McAfee, Microsoft Defender, Microworld, Norton, PC Matic, Protected. It also looked for ransomware, although AV-TEST states that not even a positive detection can prevent an attack from progressing. The investigation involved testing the programs on around 12,000 malware samples mixed into 1.5 million files to see which of them could distinguish between something malicious and something innocent. But according to a new evaluation of various security packages, Microsoft’s product consumes more system resources than other AV programs.ĪV-TEST, an independent organization that rates and rates antivirus and security suite software, tested 18 antivirus packages for Windows 10. Why it matters: Many people choose Microsoft Defender as their default antivirus software since it is part of the Windows operating system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |